Coach Potter
Life of the Party
First off, I'm not touch feely about any fish. Some number of fish are going to die every year from something. I also don't eat fish so my intention is to never kill one but that's ONLY because I don't plan on eating them. I take the best care I can but I'm not losing sleep over any of it...that's just me and doesn't have to be you.Not sure why foul hooking a fish is considered worse for the trout (unless it is near the eyes or gills) than tranditional in the mouth or worse - throat/gills when the fish chokes the fly down? Most of the fish I foul hook is somewhere in the body, tail, or fin and it doesn't really penatrate the skin or slightly in the muscle tissue at worse. It does take a lot longer to get the trout in - but after a bit of reviving - they are ready to go with no major injury.
As mentioned about - we do have consider this sport as a Blood Sport - and there will be times when we do get them in the eye or in the gills and have a bleeder. That is why I am not really in favor of 100% C&R in some of our flyfish only waters, just in case we get a bleeder and at times no matter how careful we are - there will a few execeptions that the fish is going to die and in my opinion we should keep be able to keep those severally injured - unless we are certain that a osprey, eagle, or otter will benefit from it. It pains me to release an injured fish which I know most likely will not make it because of the 100% C&R rules. One fish limits are better in my opinion, but then again maybe too many folks will take advantage of that situation thus defeating the purpose of why a 100% C&R is implemented in the first place.
Peach
I think trout are different than warm water species because 1- they are more fragile than warm water species 2- they have teeth and can't be lipped when landed. When I land a bass, crappie, blue gill etc. I can lip them and remove the hook without really touching or squeezing the body. Cold water species such as Pike, Walleye and Musky are a lot tougher than any of the various trout species.
I used to bird hunt because I ate birds. If I wound a bird I assume it's going to die. Had I made a better shot it was also going to die. The only difference was one I could eat and the other I couldn't and I was likely going to kill a fair number of them anyway. If I was truly concerned about the population of a certain bird species then I wouldn't hunt them.
I have a completely different view of wounded big game than wounded waterfowl or upland birds...again just just me. I can only put a tag on one deer, as it should be. If I mortally wound a deer and don't recover it I WIIL and HAVE lost sleep over that. Lots of reasons I feel that way...both practical and emotional.