Frankly I feel safer at Cabela's than I do at Pike Place Market.
Whether something is dramatic is a matter of judgement. You judge it as you see fit. That judgement has nothing to do with the point of the experience that I shared.Little bit dramatic maybe? Even I have ducked down in the brush when a really sketchy old pickup has approached on some remote gravel back roads but I think your ok at Cabelas.
They do not. That was my point.Frankly I feel safer at Cabela's than I do at Pike Place Market.
Maybe we should do a "Bumper Stickers at Cabelas" thread similar to those "Freaks of Walmart" websites that pop up all the time.Little bit dramatic maybe? Even I have ducked down in the brush when a really sketchy old pickup has approached on some remote gravel back roads but I think your ok at Cabelas.
I seriously have never seen a bumper sticker that threatened rebellion or made me fear for my safety.Maybe we should do a "Bumper Stickers at Cabelas" thread similar to those "Freaks of Walmart" websites that pop up all the time.
TBH, there are some that take bumper stickers to a fine, rebellious, line, and some state majorly implied threats, which I think is what the Sullivans may have reacted to. And ya know, that's their right to excercise caution.
I like the various microbrew and cannabis shop stickers. Nothing like letting the police know what car to do a dui test onMy favorite bumper sticker from the douche bag ignorant idiots is the.....
"Fuck off were full" stickers.
It's a classy way to let all the grownups know we got a childish knucklehead behind the wheel of this oversized truck.
And if they looked closer they would also see the side step needed for the wee-man to make the leap into the cab.
My bad. Poor communication on my part.This thread is starting to wander a bit again. Button it up to subject on hand. Second warning.
Thanks for the informative reply!Howdy Zak,
Yep, WA ST BHA is super active, and doing great work. As a matter of fact our WA ST board was one of the first groups to sound the alarm about this animal rights consortium that we feel are trying to undermine the North American Model of Conservation.
Also, we were at the head of the table trying to defend the spring bear season in Washington. Ultimately, as others have mentioned the commission went fully against the departments science based recs and voted away from science and went with feelings
BHA as a whole seeks to be "the voice for the wild public lands, waters and wildlife". There are chapters in 48 states and 3 Canadian provinces..also we have clubs in 26 colleges and 23 military installations with our Armed Forces Initiative.
We do a ton of on the ground habitat improvement, public land and water cleanups as well. Additionally we work on big picture issues like Recovering America's wildlife act, Land and Water Conservation Fund and a ton of stuff from regional, state and national level
If you ever have a question, feel free to hit me up!
Thanks for that!Howdy Zak,
Yep, WA ST BHA is super active, and doing great work. As a matter of fact our WA ST board was one of the first groups to sound the alarm about this animal rights consortium that we feel are trying to undermine the North American Model of Conservation.
Also, we were at the head of the table trying to defend the spring bear season in Washington. Ultimately, as others have mentioned the commission went fully against the departments science based recs and voted away from science and went with feelings
BHA as a whole seeks to be "the voice for the wild public lands, waters and wildlife". There are chapters in 48 states and 3 Canadian provinces..also we have clubs in 26 colleges and 23 military installations with our Armed Forces Initiative.
We do a ton of on the ground habitat improvement, public land and water cleanups as well. Additionally we work on big picture issues like Recovering America's wildlife act, Land and Water Conservation Fund and a ton of stuff from regional, state and national level
If you ever have a question, feel free to hit me up!
We have a citizen fish and wildlife commission for the same kind of reasons we have a civilian commander in chief instead of having the highest ranking military general making all our national political decisions. The intent is to have commissioners who have a broad knowledge of fish and wildlife along with some relevant experience to set policy for and to provide guidance to the Department of Fish and Wildlife. This is how we are supposed to get social and economic considerations taken into account with the strict biological and ecological parameters that influence what happens with fish and wildlife populations. I can live with that. In fact, that is what I want. The problem, as I see it, is when the Commission forsakes the "public interest" for special interests.The WDFW commission went against the WDFW biologists 100% by vote. That's exactly what happened. Hence why I make statements they are a rogue radical group. They shouldn't exist. Why pay for a department that gets overruled by a citizen commission group?
That’s a great question.Ok, so, we can't just fire them all and start over.. though that might make many happy.
Those of you more familiar with the processes, is there a legal framework within the WDFW or legislative appointee process that we can use to fight back ?
I think Billy kindly asked to change topics. My bad there.What bumper stickers are you guys finding objectionable??